Login
Recover password
Registration

Members can log in to create events, publish stories, share resources and modify their password and newsletter subscription.

E-mail *
First name *
Last name *
Language preference *
Newsletter options *

By clicking below to submit this form, I hereby agree to the Sphere’s Privacy Policy and terms of use.

Sharpening the gender angle of the revised Sphere standards

Encouraging women to participate in construction trainings or apprenticeships and to apply for positions generally reserved for males helps achieve transformative change. Photo: Distribution of construction material to families affected by an earthquake in Guatemala. © Laura Martínez/Mercy Corps

By Mireia Cano Viñas (*)

For most humanitarian practitioners nowadays, the question is no longer “Why do we need to integrate gender in our work?” but “How do we do it?” As a result, one of the most demanded competencies is proficiency on gender analysis, that is, the ability to identify the distinct needs, priorities and capacities of women, men, girls and boys and to adapt assistance in accordance with them.

At the core of the Sphere Handbook revision is the commitment to continue supporting people’s own capacity to act, while broadening the base of evidence on how to do it well.

With that aim in mind, a writing group made of technical experts on gender, older people, children and disability was constituted. Together with other peer review groups, these experts provide input to chapter authors and review the various drafts.

The following recommendations seek to further integrate gender into the next edition of the Sphere Handbook:

Key actions must promote meaningful participation. To achieve this, humanitarian professionals need to equally and separately consult men, women, girls and boys at all stages of the programme cycle. Only in this way can humanitarian response be more effective, comprehensive, durable and sustainable.

While acknowledging that women and girls are disproportionally impacted by crisis, it is also important to provide examples of how to target the needs and capacities of men and boys. For example, a recommendation related to infant and young child feeding is to include an action aimed to support men who are single heads of households and youth who take care of their siblings without any help. And when there is no female caregiver or when males want to come to the malnutrition centre, adequate access for males too should be ensured.

Ensure that polygamous households receive special attention. In polygamous societies, the distribution of goods should preferably target women. The goal is to ensure that each wife and her children receive appropriate assistance.

Change the language from “vulnerable groups” to groups with “special needs based on their gender, age, ability, etc.” In general, use positive language on women and men as agents of change with their own capacities rather than as passive groups with needs. This strengthens the focus on people’s own aptitude to act.

Provide specific guidance or suggest examples. For instance, instead of giving generic advice like “Consider distribution issues,” explain the following: “Consider distribution issues as, for example, separate queues when it is not culturally acceptable that women and men stand together in crowds.”

Make it explicit that data on a population affected by the crisis should always be broken down by sex and age and diversity factors such as disability, ethnicity, religion or others as relevant to the context. This way of collecting data is essential to understand precisely which people are affected by a crisis and ensure that services are not off-target. It also sends a powerful signal that everyone is recognised and their rights respected.

Include information about gratuity of the assistance and the existence of complaints mechanisms in the packaging of aid parcels, to reduce corruption and sexual exploitation and abuse.

Where relevant, use discussions on gender, age and diversity to go beyond the minimum standards and seek transformative change. For example, for shelter standards, state the need to determine ways to encourage women to participate in construction trainings or apprenticeships and to apply for positions generally reserved for males. The idea here is that addressing structural causes and consequences of gender inequality contributes to achieving lasting change in the lives of women, girls, boys and men.

Additionally, the writing group has made specific recommendations for each of the sectoral chapters. Below are some examples:

Water supply, sanitation and hygiene promotion (WASH).

  • Conduct gender analysis for all WASH activities including collecting, storing and treating water;
  • Ensure toilets, water collection, laundry and bathing facilities meet the different needs;
  • Ensure WASH meets the needs of pregnant women and girls, as adolescent girls tend to be disregarded;
  • Ensure that those who need assistance with personal hygiene and their caregivers can access the appropriate items at home.
  • Shelter, settlement and household items.

  • Consider the rights of women in housing, land titles and inheritance;
  • Help men and women alike obtain identity cards;
  • Create private spaces for drying laundry in housing, as well as washing it;
  • Provide additional support to men and women who do not have the capacity, ability or opportunity to undertake construction-related activities. This can include: managing the construction on their behalf through professional builders; providing additional technical assistance; additional financial assistance; providing materials directly to the construction site; providing access to professionals who can design solutions adapted to specific needs such as physical and mental disabilities;
  • Ensure that cash for work does not disrupt local markets and is beneficial to both women and men;
  • Determine if it is culturally appropriate for men and women to have the same distribution line.
  • Food security and nutrition.

  • Pay attention to who is receiving cash vouchers in the household, including in polygamous households;
  • Assess intra-household, socio-cultural nutrition practices, such as men eating first;
  • Tailor messages to people that might influence infant and young child feeding in the household or community (mothers, fathers, grandmothers, leaders, etc.) to enhance ownership of the new practices by all;
  • Ensure both women and men can access malnutrition centres;
  • Target male single heads of households for nutrition programmes.
  • Health action.

  • Highlight the importance of mapping and engaging local actors in coordination mechanisms of sexual and reproductive health services;
  • Under HIV, mention men who have sex with men, transgender persons and sex workers, whose HIV prevention/treatment needs require a dual approach: mainstreaming into primary health care, as well as targeted outreach and tailored programming; 
  • Ensure that awareness-raising on prevention of sexual abuse reaches groups who are often missed through wider community education (e.g., male and female adolescents and youth, persons with disabilities, LGBTI individuals and persons engaged in sex work; etc.).
  • Further integrating the gender, age and diversity dimensions in the revised Sphere Handbook will help realise the right to meaningful and relevant participation of affected people, including that of girls and boys and older men and women. It will also increase the access to assistance, while affording better protection and promoting transformative change.

    Overall, it will improve what humanitarian practitioners do and how they do it. Ultimately, it will affect the effectiveness of humanitarian response in meeting the needs of all those impacted by emergencies, especially those with special needs based on their gender, age, ability, among others.

    (*) Mireia Cano Viñas is a GenCap advisor providing gender technical expertise for the Sphere standards review. She is based in Oslo, Norway, and runs an independent gender consultancy company: Cano Gender Solutions. Contact the author by email

  • The Gender Peer Review Group includes advisors deployed by the Gender Standby Capacity Project (GenCap), CARE International, the Women’s Refugee Commission, Action contre la Faim and the European Commission Directorate General for Humanitarian aid and Civil Protection (ECHO). Other experts were resourced by HelpAge, Terre des Homes and Handicap International.